Harness design
Design the skills, context, and review loop that shape how agents work on your repos.
AI coding agents are only as good as the harness around them. Brainforge builds the skills, context, and review systems that turn coding agents into reliable contributors your team merges with confidence.
In plain terms
Where teams get stuck
Agents produce code that doesn't follow our standards.
No shared skills, so every agent setup is different.
Agent output skips tests, review, and security.
We can't measure whether agent code is helping.
What we deliver
Design the skills, context, and review loop that shape how agents work on your repos.
Build the skills and playbooks agents use to follow your standards and patterns.
Review integration, evals, and quality gates so agent output is safe to merge.
How deep it goes
The same delivery primitives (context, controls, and review) show up across every engagement.
Skills, context, and review systems shaped around your repos.
Skills and playbooks agents use to follow your standards.
Review integration and evals so agent code is safe.
Tracking agent contribution and code quality.
What changes
Proof in production
Related ways to engage
Common questions
Engagements start with a scoped build sprint, so you pay for a bounded piece of work rather than an open-ended retainer. Most teams begin with one agent workflow and its harness.
The skills, context, permissions, and review loop that shape how an agent works. It is what turns a raw coding model into a reliable contributor.
We build skills and playbooks that encode your conventions, plus review gates and evals that catch deviations before merge.
Yes. The harness approach applies to Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and others — the harness is what makes any of them reliable.
A first harness for one agent workflow typically ships in 2–4 weeks of sprint work.
How we work
We see which skills, context, and review exist and where agents create risk.
We design and build the skills, context, and review systems agents need.
We track quality and contribution, then tune from real usage.
Our Trusted Partners
In one working session we'll name what's broken, what's possible, and the first system worth building.