Business and mart modeling
Business-ready marts and models that finance, marketing, and operations can query without waiting on an analyst.
When two teams report two different numbers for the same word, the problem is the model, not the dashboard. Brainforge builds business marts, a governed semantic layer, and definitions with owners so reporting and AI answer from the same logic.
In plain terms
Where teams get stuck
Every dashboard shows a slightly different number for the same metric.
Analysts rebuild the same logic in every tool because there is no shared model.
Nobody owns metric definitions, so arguments repeat each quarter.
Legacy models are undocumented and too fragile to change.
What we deliver
Business-ready marts and models that finance, marketing, and operations can query without waiting on an analyst.
Governed metrics, dimensions, and entities that BI and AI consume from one shared definition.
Legacy models refactored and standardized so your team can change them safely.
How deep it goes
The same delivery primitives (context, controls, and review) show up across every engagement.
The modeled layer that makes reporting consistent instead of dependent on one person's query.
Agreeing what each number means before anyone builds a tile.
Cleaning up legacy logic so the model can evolve without fear.
Tests and contracts that keep the model dependable as it grows.
What changes
Proof in production
A unified shipment data model that gave full visibility across 3PLs and carriers.
Read the shipment data model case study →A governed warehouse model that put a true cost per shipment behind every carrier decision.
Read the governed model case study →Common questions
A semantic layer defines metrics, dimensions, and entities once so BI, analytics, and AI query the same logic. Teams need one when the same metric is defined differently across tools and dashboards.
No. dbt is common, but we also work in warehouse-native transformation and other modeling tools. The choice follows your stack and team, not ours.
Yes. Refactoring legacy marts and standardizing logic is a core engagement. We document what exists and change it safely rather than rebuilding for its own sake.
We assign a named owner per metric and set a review cadence, so definitions have a home and a process. Drift is a governance problem before it is a tooling problem.
The work is the same discipline. We package it around outcomes, a governed model set and a semantic layer, with a bounded scope your team can take over.
How we work
We review the current marts, definitions, and logic to find where the numbers diverge.
We build the marts and semantic layer, then agree one definition per metric with a named owner.
We document the model and train your team to extend it without us.
Our Trusted Partners
Proof next to the ask






Not sure which engagement fits? See how we scope and price the work →
In one working session we'll name what's broken, what's possible, and the first system worth building.
Press Esc to close